Tuesday, April 26, 2011

Allan Weisbecker's essay "The Deep State, Self-Deception, 9/11, and the Legend of 'FBI Maverick' John O'Neill"

Allan Weisbecker is an accomplished writer who has, for the past five years or so, dedicated quite a bit of his energies to researching 9/11 and working on a filmed memoir, which will introduce people beyond "the choir" to the truth about 9/11 and other elements of the proverbial "Matrix". He was one of the founding writers on the popular television series "Miami Vice" in the '80's, and he subsequently authored three published books (an autobiographical novel and two memoirs). I recently read his latest book, "Can't You Get Along With Anyone?: A Writer's Memoir and a Tale of a Lost Surfer's Paradise", which I highly recommend.

Recently, Weisbecker authored a detailed essay in which he puts a significant amount of focus on explaining and dissecting the Orwelian "doublethink"/denial, as well as outright "cooption", that exists within the "9/11 truth movement". In the course of this wide-ranging study he lauds our work as "ground breaking", and notes that: "911blogger.com is, in my view, an archetype of this cooption. Hence its censorship of CIT’s work on the ‘PentaCon’ is significant: It means that CIT’s expose is very damaging to the deep state agenda."

However, this essay is far from an opinion piece regarding CIT. Allan produces ground breaking investigative research of his own, exposing the "John O'Neill Legend" as a significant fabrication utilized within the propaganda surrounding the 9/11 psychological operation. Weisbecker deconstructs the details of this story and unearths several undeniable reasons to reject the notion that O'Neill was/is a hero or martyr. He shows that the preponderance of evidence points instead to him having been an accomplice to the operation who may have even faked his own alleged death that day.

Weisbecker also demonstrates how specific individuals within the movement are unwilling or unable to look at this evidence objectively and have instead rather hypocritically resorted to outright censorship or denial. Perhaps not so coincidentally, most of the same individuals and entities who reacted this way to Weisbecker's findings about O'Neill have reacted similarly to the findings of CIT.

His report amounts to a heavily detailed and sourced dissertation wherein "self-reflection" is encouraged to overcome these types of demons (denial and ego in particular), and the plight of the "truth movement" to wake up the masses regarding 9/11 is paralleled to his own efforts to expose important information about 9/11 to people within "the movement".

Please set aside some time to read the entire essay as well as take the time to click on his numerous supplemental youtube links which usually consist of a minute or two of supporting audio and video that he has personally compiled. I'm confident that you'll find it as enlightening as I did.

The Deep State, Self-Deception, 9/11, and the Legend of "FBI Maverick" John O'Neill

Make sure not to skip the Foreword.

Allan Weisbecker:


GreekForTruth said...


Sounds suspiciously Jewish, doesn't it now?

Not much info about his origins on the net, therefore could someone confirm please?

Or have I just been blacklisted from the CIT community???


Citizen Investigation Team said...


I never thought to ask him his race/religion. Did you read his essay?

GreekForTruth said...

No, not yet, quite busy in the studio at the moment..I will asap...Of course I trust your judgement but, if he's a jew, i 'll make sure i read between the lines!!

You see, I'm one of those paranoid ''conspiracy theorists'' who happens to know,,,eerr,, i mean to erroneously believe that the jews are, solely or partially, behind 9/11, 7/7, Lockerbie & countless other false-flag operations as well as the blatant terrorist acts ( USS Liberty, King David Hotel, Lavon Affair etc)..

Well, not to put too fine a point on it, I don't fucking trust any of them!!

Hence my reservations!!

Rich Besco said...

While there may very likely be criminal conspirators to the horrific events of 9/11 (and many other atrocities) who are supporters of hard-line Zionist policies within/without Israel, this fact and/or that some of them may be Jewish should not compel your blanket condemnation of, and disparaging use of the term, "the jews", anymore than we should blame actions of the Mafia on their entire respective religious, ethnic, or political groups, imho. Please choose your words more carefully, so as not to unecessarily diminish the effectiveness of advancing the precious truths we so dearly long for, and deserve.

Citizen Investigation Team said...

Well said Rich.

Be skeptical all you want but Weisbecker's essay is damn good so just read it first. Plus his latest book that I read is a memoir that goes into extreme detail about his colorful life. This guy is definitely no shill for Israel!

lv911truth said...

This story is PUBLISHED at 911NewsCentral.com.

Link: http://pligg.911newscentral.com/story.php?title=allan-weisbeckers-essay-the-deep-state-self-deception-911-and-the-legend-of-fbi-maverick-john-oneill-

GreekForTruth said...

Fair enough...I will read the essay, I was gonna read it anyway!

As for Rich's comment, my scepticism & my observation are well-founded,,,,you see my friend, I happen to know my History pretty well & I remain unrepentant!
However this is not the place to discuss/ expand on the subject..the last thing i need is a pair of mean dudes like Craig & Aldo on my back...

But, should you wish to do so, you can always visit me here:


and let's see who the biggest obstacle to '...advancing the precious truths we so dearly long for, and deserve...' is!

Steve said...

John 14:6 "Jesus saith unto him, I am the way, the TRUTH, and the life"

"Howbeit no man spake openly of him(the TRUTH) for fear of the Jews" John 7:13

To avoid the "Jewish question" as a strategy to awaken the public, is a good thing.....maybe; because in their search for TRUTH, they will eventually come to find out who the perpetrators are.
But to DENY it, is to spread disinformation, whether consciously, or unconsciously.

Citizen Investigation Team said...

Come on guys I know it's a long essay but it's worth the read. Comments on the content are appreciated.

GreekForTruth said...

Ok, I 've had a quick look through it & my initial impression was that there's not much music there that we haven't already heard save for a couple of overtones, notably the Nick Rosen & Greg Palast instances....

Also, I've noticed that he keeps using terms such as ''buying into'', denying'', ''double-thinking'', as oppoed to ''outright shilling''!!

And NO mention of CIT???

But as I said, I will peruse it when my time permits it & with English being my second, self-taught language, it will take some effort, lol.

Citizen Investigation Team said...

It's ok if you don't want to take the effort to read it GFT but if you don't I think it would be wise to refrain from commenting as well. All you have to do is read my review in this blog to know that he mentions CIT. However, as I also said, this essay is not about CIT. If after you actually read it you have issues with what he asserts (as opposed to what he doesn't assert, since he clearly asserts quite a bit) I'm all ears.

GreekForTruth said...

Of course, of course!! My bad!!

I guess I'll have to wait until the tape stops rolling & the guitars are back in their cases, then pour me a glass of Blue Label, put my feet on the desk & give it my full attention.


punksterdaddy said...

The jews? Really?

I just wished to say that I am well impressed with you guy's work on the 911 attack on the Petagon. I have not read this man's book but I shall take your recommendation on it and without some half arsed Racism to add!
Just felt the need to comment on here despite that I too have not read this, it was the G4T comments that made me angry!

No I am not a Jew. I have an open mind to most things but I don't like idiotic statements made on a basis of ZERO facts?

Anyway, well done on the fine work that you have done and you have shown that you were not biased in your findings.

katze said...

the year 2001 should not be repeated

herb said...

Good recommendation. I like his writing style. Never even looked into O'Neil as I felt it was a confirmation of the official 9/11 story.

Looks like I was right.

freeclassifides said...

I read your article which I assume has been written after deep thought. I have been following you for a while
and have asked my friends also to do so.

Post a Comment